Chapter title |
Phencyclidine-Based New Psychoactive Substances
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 124 |
Book title |
Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
|
Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/164_2018_124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-010560-0, 978-3-03-010561-7
|
Authors |
Jason Wallach, Simon D. Brandt, Wallach, Jason, Brandt, Simon D. |
Abstract |
The serendipitous discovery of phencyclidine (PCP) in 1956 sets the stage for significant research efforts that resulted in a plethora of analogs and derivatives designed to explore the biological effects of this class. PCP soon became the prototypical dissociative agent that eventually sneaked through the doors of clinical laboratories and became an established street drug. Estimations suggest that around 14 PCP analogs were identified as "street drugs" in the period between the 1960s and 1990s. Fast forward to the 2000s, and largely facilitated by advancements in electronic forms of communication made possible through the Internet, a variety of new PCP analogs began to attract the attention of communities interested in the collaborative exploration of these substances. Traditionally, as was the case with the first-generation analogs identified in previous decades, the substances explored represented compounds already known in the scientific literature. As the decade of the noughties unfolded, a number of new PCP-derived substances appeared on the scene, which included some analogs that have not been previously recorded in the published literature. The aim of this chapter is to present a brief introductory overview of substances that have materialized as PCP-derived new psychoactive substances (NPS) in recent years and their known pharmacology. Since N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonism is implicated in mediating the subjective and mind-altering effects of many dissociative drugs, additional data are included from other analogs not presently identified as NPS. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
Hungary | 1 | 10% |
Portugal | 1 | 10% |
Norway | 1 | 10% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 7 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |