You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
NMR screening in fragment-based drug design: a practical guide.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 16 |
Book title |
Chemical Biology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2268-0, 978-1-4939-2269-7
|
Authors |
Kim HY, Wyss DF, Hai-Young Kim, Daniel F. Wyss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 7 | 39% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,156,089
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,109
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,013
of 353,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#76
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.