↓ Skip to main content

Human Neural Stem Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Human Neural Stem Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Derivation of Neural Stem Cells from the Developing and Adult Human Brain
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Human Somatic Stem Cell Neural Differentiation Potential
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Neural Stem Cells Derived from Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Use in Models of CNS Injury
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Generation of Human Neural Stem Cells by Direct Phenotypic Conversion
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Epigenetic Regulation of Human Neural Stem Cell Differentiation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Reveal Common Neurodevelopmental Genome Deprograming in Schizophrenia
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Genome Editing in Human Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Brain Organoids: Expanding Our Understanding of Human Development and Disease
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Bioengineering of the Human Neural Stem Cell Niche: A Regulatory Environment for Cell Fate and Potential Target for Neurotoxicity
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Updates on Human Neural Stem Cells: From Generation, Maintenance, and Differentiation to Applications in Spinal Cord Injury Research
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Human Neural Stem Cells for Ischemic Stroke Treatment
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Modeling Complex Neurological Diseases with Stem Cells: A Study of Bipolar Disorder
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Neural Stem Cell Dysfunction in Human Brain Disorders
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Human Fetal Neural Stem Cells for Neurodegenerative Disease Treatment
Attention for Chapter 14: Human Fetal Neural Stem Cells for Neurodegenerative Disease Treatment
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Human Fetal Neural Stem Cells for Neurodegenerative Disease Treatment
Chapter number 14
Book title
Human Neural Stem Cells
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-93485-3_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-993484-6, 978-3-31-993485-3
Authors

Daniela Ferrari, Maurizio Gelati, Daniela Celeste Profico, Angelo Luigi Vescovi

Abstract

Clinical trials for Parkinson's disease, which used primary brain fetal tissue, have demonstrated that neural stem cell therapy could be suitable for neurodegenerative diseases. The use of fetal tissue presents several issues that have hampered the clinical development of this approach. In addition to the ethical concerns related to the required continuous supply of fetal specimen, the necessity to use cells from multiple fetuses in a single graft greatly compounded the problem. Cell viability and composition vary in different donors, and, further, the heterogeneity in the donor cells increased the probability of immunological rejection or contamination. An ideal cell source for cell therapy is one that is renewable, thus eliminating the need for transplantation of primary fetal tissue, and that also allows for viability, sterility, cell composition, and cell maturation to be controlled, while being inherently not tumorigenic. The availability of continuous and standardized clinical grade normal human neural cells, able to combine the plasticity of fetal tissue with an extensive proliferating capacity and functional stability, would be of paramount importance for the translation of cell therapy for central nervous system (CNS) disorders into the clinic. Here we describe a well-established protocol to produce human neural stem cells following GMP guidelines that allows us to obtain "clinical grade" cell lines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#134
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,923
of 442,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.