↓ Skip to main content

Cancer Epigenetics for Precision Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Cancer Epigenetics for Precision Medicine'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Early Epigenetic Markers for Precision Medicine
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Interplay Between Genetic and Epigenetic Changes in Breast Cancer Subtypes
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Role of Microbiome in Carcinogenesis Process and Epigenetic Regulation of Colorectal Cancer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Epigenome-Based Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Review on Current Trends of Deep Learning
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Epigenetics in Hematological Malignancies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 MicroRNAs Role in Prostate Cancer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Effects of Dietary Nutrients on Epigenetic Changes in Cancer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Diet, Microbiome, and Epigenetics in the Era of Precision Medicine
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Alcohol-Induced Epigenetic Changes in Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Epigenetic Basis of Circadian Rhythm Disruption in Cancer
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Epigenetic Changes of the Immune System with Role in Tumor Development
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 DNA Methylation as a Biomarker of Aging in Epidemiologic Studies
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Challenges and Opportunities in Social Epigenomics and Cancer
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Epigenetic and Genetic Regulation of PDCD1 Gene in Cancer Immunology
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Methylation and MicroRNA Profiling to Understand Racial Disparities of Prostate Cancer
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Analysis of DNA Hypermethylation in Pancreatic Cancer Using Methylation-Specific PCR and Bisulfite Sequencing
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Pyrosequencing Methylation Analysis
Attention for Chapter 10: Epigenetic Basis of Circadian Rhythm Disruption in Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Epigenetic Basis of Circadian Rhythm Disruption in Cancer
Chapter number 10
Book title
Cancer Epigenetics for Precision Medicine
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8751-1_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8750-4, 978-1-4939-8751-1
Authors

Edyta Reszka, Shanbeh Zienolddiny, Reszka, Edyta, Zienolddiny, Shanbeh

Abstract

Self-sustained and synchronized to environmental stimuli, circadian clocks are under genetic and epigenetic regulation. Recent findings have greatly increased our understanding of epigenetic plasticity governed by circadian clock. Thus, the link between circadian clock and epigenetic machinery is reciprocal. Circadian clock can affect epigenetic features including genomic DNA methylation, noncoding RNA, mainly miRNA expression, and histone modifications resulted in their 24-h rhythms. Concomitantly, these epigenetic events can directly modulate cyclic system of transcription and translation of core circadian genes and indirectly clock output genes. Significant findings interlocking circadian clock, epigenetics, and cancer have been revealed, particularly in breast, colorectal, and blood cancers. Aberrant methylation of circadian gene promoter regions and miRNA expression affected circadian gene expression, together with 24-h expression oscillation pace have been frequently observed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,403,378
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,256
of 14,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,210
of 346,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#31
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.