↓ Skip to main content

Zinc Finger Proteins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Zinc Finger Proteins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 PRDM14, a Zinc Finger Protein, Regulates Cancer Stemness
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Computational Methods for Analysis of the DNA-Binding Preferences of Cys2His2 Zinc-Finger Proteins
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Design and Application of 6mA-Specific Zinc-Finger Proteins for the Readout of DNA Methylation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Enhanced Manipulation of Human Mitochondrial DNA Heteroplasmy In Vitro Using Tunable mtZFN Technology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Engineering RNA-Binding Proteins by Modular Assembly of RanBP2-Type Zinc Fingers
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Design of a System for Monitoring Ubiquitination Activities of E2 Enzymes Using Engineered RING Finger Proteins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Directed Evolution of Targeted Recombinases for Genome Engineering
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Optical Recording of Cellular Zinc Dynamics with Zinc-Finger-Based Biosensors
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Delivery of Superoxide Dismutase Using Cys 2 -His 2 Zinc-Finger Proteins
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Genome Editing of MSCs as a Platform for Cell Therapy
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Integrated Multimodal Evaluation of Genotoxicity in ZFN-Modified Primary Human Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Selection and Characterization of DNA Aptamers Against FokI Nuclease Domain
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 An Improved Genome Engineering Method Using Surrogate Reporter-Coupled Suicidal ZFNs
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Non-transgenic Approach to Deliver ZFNs in Seeds for Targeted Genome Engineering
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Gene Editing in Channel Catfish via Double Electroporation of Zinc-Finger Nucleases
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Delivery of mtZFNs into Early Mouse Embryos
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Stereotaxic Surgery and Viral Delivery of Zinc-Finger Epigenetic Editing Tools in Rodent Brain
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 In Vivo Applications of Cell-Penetrating Zinc-Finger Transcription Factors
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Manufacturing and Delivering Genome-Editing Proteins
Attention for Chapter 17: Stereotaxic Surgery and Viral Delivery of Zinc-Finger Epigenetic Editing Tools in Rodent Brain
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Stereotaxic Surgery and Viral Delivery of Zinc-Finger Epigenetic Editing Tools in Rodent Brain
Chapter number 17
Book title
Zinc Finger Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8799-3_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8798-6, 978-1-4939-8799-3
Authors

Peter J. Hamilton, Carissa J. Lim, Eric J. Nestler, Elizabeth A. Heller, Hamilton, Peter J., Lim, Carissa J., Nestler, Eric J., Heller, Elizabeth A.

Abstract

Delivery of engineered zinc-finger proteins (ZFPs) for targeted epigenetic remodeling in rodent brain can be facilitated by the use of viral vector-mediated gene transfer coupled with stereotaxic surgery techniques. Here we describe the surgical protocol utilized by our group which is optimized for herpes simplex virus (HSV) delivery into mouse brain. The protocol outlined herein could be applied for delivery of adeno-associated viruses (AAV) or lentiviruses in both mice and rats. This method allows for the viral expression of engineered DNA-binding factors, particularly engineered ZFPs, and subsequent epigenome editing in rodent brain with excellent spatiotemporal control. Nearly any brain region of interest can be targeted in rodents at every stage of postnatal life. Owing to the versatility, reproducibility, and utility of this technique, it is an important method for any laboratory interested in studying the cellular, circuit, and behavioral consequences of in vivo neuroepigenetic editing with synthetic ZFP constructs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,412
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,181
of 442,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.