↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Article

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Fungal Protease Model to Interrogate Allergic Lung Immunity
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Mouse Model of Peanut Allergy Induced by Sensitization Through the Gastrointestinal Tract
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Induction and Characterization of the Allergic Eye Disease Mouse Model
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Isolation and Purification of Epithelial and Endothelial Cells from Mouse Lung
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Determination of the Fate and Function of Innate Lymphoid Cells Following Adoptive Transfer of Innate Lymphoid Cell Precursors
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Characterization of Thymic Development of Natural Killer T Cell Subsets by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Characterization of Mouse γδ T Cell Subsets in the Setting of Type-2 Immunity
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Generation of Allergen-Specific Tetramers for a Murine Model of Airway Inflammation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Generation and Use of Allergen-Specific TCR Transgenic Animals
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Imaging Precision-Cut Lung Slices to Visualize Leukocyte Localization and Trafficking
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Study of IgE-Producing B Cells Using the Verigem Fluorescent Reporter Mouse
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Identification of Functionally Relevant microRNAs in the Regulation of Allergic Inflammation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 The Use of Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Tolerogenic Therapy of Allergic Inflammation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Assessing the Mouse Intestinal Microbiota in Settings of Type-2 Immune Responses
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 A Consistent Method to Identify and Isolate Mononuclear Phagocytes from Human Lung and Lymph Nodes
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Utilization of Air–Liquid Interface Cultures as an In Vitro Model to Assess Primary Airway Epithelial Cell Responses to the Type 2 Cytokine Interleukin-13
Attention for Chapter: An Integrated and Semiautomated Microscaled Approach to Profile Cis-Regulatory Elements by Histone Modification ChIP-Seq for Large-Scale Epigenetic Studies
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
An Integrated and Semiautomated Microscaled Approach to Profile Cis-Regulatory Elements by Histone Modification ChIP-Seq for Large-Scale Epigenetic Studies
Book title
Type 2 Immunity
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7896-0_22
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7895-3, 978-1-4939-7896-0
Authors

Diana Youhanna Jankeel, Justin Cayford, Benjamin Joachim Schmiedel, Pandurangan Vijayanand, Grégory Seumois

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-Seq) is the preferred approach to map histone modifications and identify cis-regulatory DNA elements throughout the genome. Multiple methods have been described to increase the efficiency of library preparation and to reduce hands-on time as well as costs. This review describes detailed steps to perform cell fixation, chromatin shearing, immunoprecipitation, and sequencing library preparation for a batch of 48-96 samples with small cell numbers. The protocol implements a semiautomated platform to reduce technical variability and improve signal-to-noise ratio as well as reduce hands-on time, thus allowing large-scale epigenetic studies of clinical samples with limited cell numbers.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,523,725
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,976
of 13,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,481
of 442,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,194
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.