↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Article

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Fungal Protease Model to Interrogate Allergic Lung Immunity
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Mouse Model of Peanut Allergy Induced by Sensitization Through the Gastrointestinal Tract
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Induction and Characterization of the Allergic Eye Disease Mouse Model
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Isolation and Purification of Epithelial and Endothelial Cells from Mouse Lung
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Determination of the Fate and Function of Innate Lymphoid Cells Following Adoptive Transfer of Innate Lymphoid Cell Precursors
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Characterization of Thymic Development of Natural Killer T Cell Subsets by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Characterization of Mouse γδ T Cell Subsets in the Setting of Type-2 Immunity
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Generation of Allergen-Specific Tetramers for a Murine Model of Airway Inflammation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Generation and Use of Allergen-Specific TCR Transgenic Animals
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Imaging Precision-Cut Lung Slices to Visualize Leukocyte Localization and Trafficking
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Study of IgE-Producing B Cells Using the Verigem Fluorescent Reporter Mouse
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Identification of Functionally Relevant microRNAs in the Regulation of Allergic Inflammation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 The Use of Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Tolerogenic Therapy of Allergic Inflammation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Assessing the Mouse Intestinal Microbiota in Settings of Type-2 Immune Responses
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 A Consistent Method to Identify and Isolate Mononuclear Phagocytes from Human Lung and Lymph Nodes
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Utilization of Air–Liquid Interface Cultures as an In Vitro Model to Assess Primary Airway Epithelial Cell Responses to the Type 2 Cytokine Interleukin-13
Attention for Chapter 5: Induction and Characterization of the Allergic Eye Disease Mouse Model
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Induction and Characterization of the Allergic Eye Disease Mouse Model
Chapter number 5
Book title
Type 2 Immunity
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7896-0_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7895-3, 978-1-4939-7896-0
Authors

Nancy J. Reyes, Rose Mathew, Daniel R. Saban, Reyes, Nancy J., Mathew, Rose, Saban, Daniel R.

Abstract

Ocular IgE-associated allergy ranges from mild disease (seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis) to more chronic/severe and vision-threatening forms (atopic and vernal keratoconjunctivitis). Whereas mild forms of disease have been studied extensively, less is known about the more chronic forms. Our lab has helped to address this knowledge gap by developing and characterizing an allergen-induced, chronic/severe, IgE-associated model of ocular allergy referred to as the severe allergic eye disease (AED) model. It is distinct from previously described models that mimic the more mild forms, referred to in the literature as the allergic conjunctivitis (AC) model. The purpose of this method article is to detail the protocol to induce and characterize the AED model and directly compare these mice to the mild AC model. Troubleshooting and implications are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,746,323
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#521
of 13,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,030
of 442,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#32
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.