You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Defining orthologs and pangenome size metrics.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Bacterial Pangenomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1720-4_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1719-8, 978-1-4939-1720-4
|
| Authors |
Bosi E, Fani R, Fondi M, Emanuele Bosi, Renato Fani, Marco Fondi, Bosi, Emanuele, Fani, Renato, Fondi, Marco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,651,561
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,038
of 13,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,490
of 356,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#154
of 1,005 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,005 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.