You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The pyrosequencing protocol for bacterial genomes.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Bacterial Pangenomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1720-4_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1719-8, 978-1-4939-1720-4
|
| Authors |
Rizzi E, Ermanno Rizzi, Rizzi, Ermanno |
| Abstract |
The pyrosequencing methodology was applied in 2005 by 454 Lifesciences to the emerging field of next generation sequencing (NGS), revolutionizing the way of DNA sequencing. In the last years the same strategy grew up and was technologically updated, reaching a high throughput in terms of amount of generated sequences (reads) per run and in terms of length of sequence up to values of 800-1,000 bases. These features of pyrosequencing perfectly fit to bacterial genome sequencing for the de novo assemblies and resequencing as well. The approaches of shotgun and paired ends sequencing allow the bacterial genome finishing providing a high-quality data in few days with unprecedented results. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 54% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,203,052
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,174
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,895
of 260,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#23
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.