↓ Skip to main content

Date Palm Biotechnology Protocols Volume II

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Date Palm Biotechnology Protocols Volume II'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Storage and Viability Assessment of Date Palm Pollen
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Vitro Conservation of Date Palm Tissue Cultures
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Cryopreservation of Date Palm Pro-Embryonic Masses Using the D Cryo-plate Technique
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 In Vitro Cryopreservation of Date Palm Caulogenic Meristems
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 In Vitro Conservation of Date Palm Shoot-Tip Explants and Callus Cultures Under Minimal Growth Conditions
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 In Vitro Conservation of Date Palm Somatic Embryos Using Growth-Retardant Conditions
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Encapsulation of Date Palm Somatic Embryos: Synthetic Seeds
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Evaluation of Clonal Fidelity of Micropropagated Date Palm by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Molecular Identification of Fungal Contamination in Date Palm Tissue Cultures
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Genetic Diversity Analysis of Date Palm Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR)
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Date Palm Genetic Diversity Analysis Using Microsatellite Polymorphism
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Assessing Date Palm Genetic Diversity Using Different Molecular Markers
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Molecular Analysis of Date Palm Genetic Diversity Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSRs)
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Determining Phylogenetic Relationships Among Date Palm Cultivars Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) Markers
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Genotyping and Molecular Identification of Date Palm Cultivars Using Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) Markers
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Molecular Identification of Date Palm Cultivars Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Markers
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Early Sex Identification in Date Palm by Male-Specific Sequence-Characterized Amplified Region (SCAR) Markers
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Gender Identification in Date Palm Using Molecular Markers
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Development of Sex-Specific PCR-Based Markers in Date Palm
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Date Palm Sex Differentiation Based on Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Characterization and Amplification of Gene-Based Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers in Date Palm
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Mitochondrial Molecular Markers for Resistance to Bayoud Disease in Date Palm
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Analysis of Expressed Sequence Tags (EST) in Date Palm
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Development of Genomic Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) by Enrichment Libraries in Date Palm
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 MicroRNA Expression in Multistage Date Fruit Development
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Proteome of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Date Palm
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Electrophoresis-Based Proteomics to Study Development and Germination of Date Palm Zygotic Embryos
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Date Fruit Proteomics During Development and Ripening Stages
Attention for Chapter 4: In Vitro Cryopreservation of Date Palm Caulogenic Meristems
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In Vitro Cryopreservation of Date Palm Caulogenic Meristems
Chapter number 4
Book title
Date Palm Biotechnology Protocols Volume II
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7159-6_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7158-9, 978-1-4939-7159-6
Authors

Lotfi Fki, Olfa Chkir, Walid Kriaa, Ameni Nasri, Emna Baklouti, Raja B. Masmoudi, Alain Rival, Noureddine Drira, Bart Panis, Fki, Lotfi, Chkir, Olfa, Kriaa, Walid, Nasri, Ameni, Baklouti, Emna, Masmoudi, Raja B., Rival, Alain, Drira, Noureddine, Panis, Bart

Abstract

Cryopreservation is the technology of choice not only for plant genetic resource preservation but also for virus eradication and for the efficient management of large-scale micropropagation. In this chapter, we describe three cryopreservation protocols (standard vitrification, droplet vitrification, and encapsulation vitrification) for date palm highly proliferating meristems that are initiated from vitro-cultures using plant growth regulator-free MS medium. The positive impact of sucrose preculture and cold hardening treatments on survival rates is significant. Regeneration rates obtained with standard vitrification, encapsulation-vitrification, and droplet-vitrification protocols can reach 30, 40, and 70%, respectively. All regenerated plants from non-cryopreserved or cryopreserved explants don't show morphological variation by maintaining genetic integrity without adverse effect of cryogenic treatment. Cryopreservation of date palm vitro-cultures enables commercial tissue culture laboratories to move to large-scale propagation from cryopreserved cell lines producing true-to-type plants after clonal field-testing trials. When comparing the cost of cryostorage and in-field conservation of date palm cultivars, tissue cryopreservation is the most cost-effective. Moreover, many of the risks linked to field conservation like erosion due to climatic, edaphic, and phytopathologic constraints are circumvented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,481,952
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,975
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,334
of 421,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#842
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.