↓ Skip to main content

Peptide Antibodies

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Peptide Antibodies'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Peptide Antibodies: Past, Present, and Future
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Structure of Natural and Recombinant Antibodies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Prediction of Antigenic B and T Cell Epitopes via Energy Decomposition Analysis: Description of the Web-Based Prediction Tool BEPPE
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Prediction of Antibody Epitopes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Fmoc Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Peptide-Carrier Conjugation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Solid-Phase Peptide-Carrier Conjugation
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analysis of Peptides and Conjugates by Amino Acid Analysis.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Characterization of Synthetic Peptides by Mass Spectrometry.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Interpretation of Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MSMS) Spectra for Peptide Analysis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Polyclonal Peptide Antisera
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Production and Screening of Monoclonal Peptide Antibodies
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Production of Epitope-Specific Antibodies by Immunization with Synthetic Epitope Peptide Formulated with CpG-DNA-Liposome Complex Without Carriers
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Thioredoxin-Displayed Multipeptide Immunogens
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Purification of Natural and Recombinant Peptide Antibodies by Affinity Chromatographic Strategies
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation of Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies Against Native Proteins Using Recombinant Multivalent Peptide Ligands.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Generation of TCR-Like Antibodies Using Phage Display
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Structural Characterization of Peptide Antibodies
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Automated High-Throughput Mapping of Linear B-Cell Epitopes Using a Statistical Analysis of High-Density Peptide Microarray Data
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Characterization of Peptide Antibodies by Epitope Mapping Using Resin-Bound and Soluble Peptides
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Screening and Characterization of Linear B-Cell Epitopes by Biotinylated Peptide Libraries
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Bead-Based Peptide Arrays for Profiling the Specificity of Modification State-Specific Antibodies
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Surface Plasmon Resonance Method to Evaluate Anti-citrullinated Protein/Peptide Antibody Affinity to Citrullinated Peptides
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Specificity Analysis of Histone Modification-Specific Antibodies or Reading Domains on Histone Peptide Arrays.
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Prion-Specific Antibodies Produced in Wild-Type Mice.
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Immunoblotting with Peptide Antibodies: Differential Immunoreactivities Caused by Certain Amino Acid Substitutions in a Short Peptide and Possible Effects of Differential Refolding of the Peptide on a Nitrocellulose or PVDF Membrane
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Immunocytochemical and Immunohistochemical Staining with Peptide Antibodies
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Designing B-Cell Epitopes for Immunotherapy and Subunit Vaccines
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Enterovirus-Specific Anti-peptide Antibodies
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Therapeutic HIV Peptide Vaccine
Attention for Chapter 16: Isolation of Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies Against Native Proteins Using Recombinant Multivalent Peptide Ligands.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Isolation of Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies Against Native Proteins Using Recombinant Multivalent Peptide Ligands.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Peptide Antibodies
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2999-3_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2998-6, 978-1-4939-2999-3
Authors

Alturki, Norah A, Henry, Kevin A, MacKenzie, C Roger, Arbabi-Ghahroudi, Mehdi, Norah A. Alturki, Kevin A. Henry, C. Roger MacKenzie, Mehdi Arbabi-Ghahroudi, Alturki, Norah A., Henry, Kevin A., MacKenzie, C. Roger

Abstract

Generation of antibodies against desired epitopes on folded proteins may be hampered by various characteristics of the target protein, including antigenic and immunogenic dominance of irrelevant epitopes and/or steric occlusion of the desired epitope. In such cases, peptides encompassing linear epitopes of the native protein represent attractive alternative reagents for immunization and screening. Peptide antigens are typically prepared by fusing or conjugating the peptide of interest to a carrier protein. The utility of such antigens depends on many factors including the peptide's amino acid sequence, display valency, display format (synthetic conjugate vs. recombinant fusion) and characteristics of the carrier. Here we provide detailed protocols for: (1) preparation of DNA constructs encoding peptides fused to verotoxin (VT) multimerization domain; (2) expression, purification, and characterization of the multivalent peptide-VT ligands; (3) concurrent panning of a non-immune phage-displayed camelid VHH library against the peptide-VT ligands and native protein; and (4) identification of VHHs enriched via panning using next-generation sequencing techniques. These methods are simple, rapid and can be easily adapted to yield custom peptide-VT ligands that appear to maintain the antigenic structures of the peptide. However, we caution that peptide sequences should be chosen with great care, taking into account structural, immunological, and biophysical information on the protein of interest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,293,238
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,916
of 13,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,849
of 353,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#636
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.