↓ Skip to main content

Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Structural Mechanisms in NLR Inflammasome Assembly and Signaling
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Structural Mechanisms in NLR Inflammasome Assembly and Signaling
Chapter number 2
Book title
Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41171-2_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-941170-5, 978-3-31-941171-2
Authors

Zehan Hu, Jijie Chai, Hu, Zehan, Chai, Jijie

Abstract

Inflammasomes are multimeric protein complexes that mediate the activation of inflammatory caspases. One central component of inflammasomes is nucleotide-binding domain (NBD)- and leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-containing proteins (NLRs) that can function as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). In resting cells, NLR proteins exist in an auto-inhibited, monomeric, and ADP-bound state. Perception of microbial or damage-associated signals results in NLR oligomerization, thus recruiting inflammatory caspases directly or through the adaptor molecule apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC). The assembled NLR inflammasomes serve as dedicated machinery to facilitate the activation of the inflammatory caspases. Here, we review current understanding of the structures of NLR inflammasomes with an emphasis on the molecular mechanisms of their assembly and activation. We also discuss implications of the self-propagation model derived from the NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasomes for the activation of other NLR inflammasomes and a potential role of the C-terminal LRR domain in the activation of an NLR protein.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#447
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,255
of 394,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.