↓ Skip to main content

Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections
Chapter number 7
Book title
Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41171-2_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-941170-5, 978-3-31-941171-2
Authors

Theisen, Erin, Sauer, John-Demian, Erin Theisen, John-Demian Sauer

Abstract

Inflammasomes are cytosolic innate immune surveillance systems that recognize a variety of danger signals, including those from pathogens. Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive intracellular bacterium evolved to live within the harsh environment of the host cytosol. Further, L. monocytogenes can activate a robust cell-mediated immune response that is being harnessed as an immunotherapeutic platform. Access to the cytosol is critical for both causing disease and inducing a protective immune response, and it is hypothesized that the cytosolic innate immune system, including the inflammasome, is critical for both host protection and induction of long-term immunity. L. monocytogenes can activate a variety of inflammasomes via its pore-forming toxin listeriolysin-O, flagellin, or DNA released through bacteriolysis; however, inflammasome activation attenuates L. monocytogenes, and as such, L. monocytogenes has evolved a variety of ways to limit inflammasome activation. Surprisingly, inflammasome activation also impairs the host cell-mediated immune response. Thus, understanding how L. monocytogenes activates or avoids detection by the inflammasome is critical to understand the pathogenesis of L. monocytogenes and improve the cell-mediated immune response generated to L. monocytogenes for more effective immunotherapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,466,751
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#528
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,548
of 393,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#35
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.