↓ Skip to main content

DJ-1/PARK7 Protein

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Expression of DJ-1 in Neurodegenerative Disorders
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Expression of DJ-1 in Neurodegenerative Disorders
Chapter number 3
Book title
DJ-1/PARK7 Protein
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-6583-5_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-106582-8, 978-9-81-106583-5
Authors

Daria Antipova, Rina Bandopadhyay, Antipova, Daria, Bandopadhyay, Rina

Abstract

In 2003, autosomal recessive loss-of-function mutations were identified in PARK7 gene that caused early-onset Parkinson's disease (PD). The PARK7 gene encodes a conserved protein termed DJ-1. DJ-1 is a ubiquitous protein, and within the brain, it is present in the nucleus and cytoplasm of both neuronal and glial cells. DJ-1 is a multifunctional protein, and numerous studies have ascribed various roles, including antioxidative properties, chaperone function, protease activities, mitochondrial functions and regulation of transcription to the protein. The DJ-1 protein undergoes oxidation and post-translational modifications that are important for its function. Not only is DJ-1 linked to familial PD, but it is also associated with the pathogenic mechanisms of sporadic PD and other neurodegenerative disorders where oxidative stress is implicated. In this chapter we provide an overview on the expression of DJ-1 mRNA and protein in different neurodegenerative disorders and discuss some of its main functions together with DJ-1's potential for neuroprotection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 46%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,959,314
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,272
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,455
of 421,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#209
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.