You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Nucleic Acid Aptamers
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Nucleic Acid Aptamers
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3197-2_5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3196-5, 978-1-4939-3197-2
|
| Authors |
Hamedani, Nasim Shahidi, Müller, Jens, Nasim Shahidi Hamedani, Jens Müller |
| Abstract |
Capillary electrophoresis-based SELEX (CE-SELEX) is an efficient technique for the isolation of aptamers binding to a wide range of target molecules. CE-SELEX has a number of advantages over conventional SELEX procedures such as the selection of aptamers can be performed on non-immobilized targets, usually within a fewer number of selection cycles. Here we describe a complete procedure of CE-SELEX using activated protein C (APC) as the target protein. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,812,737
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,243
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,795
of 393,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#752
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.