You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Viral Metagenomics Approaches for High-Resolution Screening of Multiplexed Arthropod and Plant Viral Communities
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Viral Metagenomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7683-6_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7682-9, 978-1-4939-7683-6
|
| Authors |
Sarah François, Denis Filloux, Emmanuel Fernandez, Mylène Ogliastro, Philippe Roumagnac, François, Sarah, Filloux, Denis, Fernandez, Emmanuel, Ogliastro, Mylène, Roumagnac, Philippe |
| Abstract |
Viral metagenomic approaches have become essential for culture-independent and sequence-independent viral detection and characterization. This chapter describes an accurate and efficient approach to (1) concentrate viral particles from arthropods and plants, (2) remove contaminating non-encapsidated nucleic acids, (3) extract and amplify both viral DNA and RNA, and (4) analyze high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data by bioinformatics. Using this approach, up to 96 arthropod or plant samples can be multiplexed in a single HTS library. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,493,741
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,390
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,806
of 442,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.