You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Small RNA Isolation from Tissues of Grapevine and Woody Plants
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Viral Metagenomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7683-6_2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7682-9, 978-1-4939-7683-6
|
| Authors |
Annalisa Giampetruzzi, Michela Chiumenti, Angelantonio Minafra, Pasquale Saldarelli, Giampetruzzi, Annalisa, Chiumenti, Michela, Minafra, Angelantonio, Saldarelli, Pasquale |
| Abstract |
A protocol is described to purify small (s)RNA molecules from tissues of grapevine and other woody plants. The protocol has been specifically developed to analyze sRNA populations by high-throughput sequencing. It has been widely used on species of the genera Prunus and Vitis particularly rich in polyphenols and other enzyme-inhibiting compounds. The high quality of the sRNAs extracted from leaf or phloem tissues makes them suitable for all molecular biology reactions, in particular for next-generation sequencing library preparation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,969
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,567
of 442,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.