↓ Skip to main content

Peptidomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Peptidomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Origins, Technological Development, and Applications of Peptidomics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Brain Tissue Sample Stabilization and Extraction Strategies for Neuropeptidomics
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation of Endogenous Peptides from Cultured Cell Conditioned Media for Mass Spectrometry
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Mass Spectrometric Identification of Endogenous Peptides
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Bioinformatics for Prohormone and Neuropeptide Discovery
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Substrate Capture Assay Using Inactive Oligopeptidases to Identify Novel Peptides
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Non-targeted Identification of d-Amino Acid-Containing Peptides Through Enzymatic Screening, Chiral Amino Acid Analysis, and LC-MS
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Quantitative Peptidomics: General Considerations
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Quantitative Peptidomics with Isotopic and Isobaric Tags
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Quantitative Peptidomics Using Reductive Methylation of Amines
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Metabolic Labeling to Quantify Drosophila Neuropeptides and Peptide Hormones
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Data Preprocessing, Visualization, and Statistical Analyses of Nontargeted Peptidomics Data from MALDI-MS
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Affinity Purification of Neuropeptide Precursors from Mice Lacking Carboxypeptidase E Activity
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Mass Spectrometry Based Immunopeptidomics for the Discovery of Cancer Neoantigens
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Milk Peptidomics to Identify Functional Peptides and for Quality Control of Dairy Products
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Neuropeptidomic Analysis of Zebrafish Brain
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Identification, Quantitation, and Imaging of the Crustacean Peptidome
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Identification of Endogenous Neuropeptides in the Nematode C. elegans Using Mass Spectrometry
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 EndoProteoFASP as a Tool to Unveil the Peptidome-Protease Profile: Application to Salivary Diagnostics
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Methodology for Urine Peptidome Analysis Based on Nano-HPLC Coupled to Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Identification of Components in Frog Skin Secretions with Therapeutic Potential as Antidiabetic Agents
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 High-Accuracy Mass Spectrometry Based Screening Method for the Discovery of Cysteine Containing Peptides in Animal Venoms and Toxins
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Analysis of the Snake Venom Peptidome
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Identification of Peptides in Spider Venom Using Mass Spectrometry
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Single Cell Peptidomics: Approach for Peptide Identification by N-Terminal Peptide Derivatization
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Peptidomic Identification of Cysteine-Rich Peptides from Plants
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Analysis of Endogenous Peptide Pools of Physcomitrella patens Moss
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 The Bright Future of Peptidomics
Attention for Chapter 22: High-Accuracy Mass Spectrometry Based Screening Method for the Discovery of Cysteine Containing Peptides in Animal Venoms and Toxins
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
High-Accuracy Mass Spectrometry Based Screening Method for the Discovery of Cysteine Containing Peptides in Animal Venoms and Toxins
Chapter number 22
Book title
Peptidomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7537-2_22
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7536-5, 978-1-4939-7537-2
Authors

Luuk N. van Oosten, Martijn W. H. Pinkse, Mervin Pieterse, Pierre Escoubas, Peter D. E. M. Verhaert, Oosten, Luuk N., Pinkse, Martijn W. H., Pieterse, Mervin, Escoubas, Pierre, Verhaert, Peter D. E. M.

Abstract

Venom and toxin samples derived from animal origins are a rich source of bioactive peptides. A high proportion of bioactive peptides that have been identified in venom contain one or more disulfide bridges, which are thought to stabilize tertiary structure, and therefore influence the peptides' specificity and activity. In this chapter, we describe a label-free mass spectrometry-based screening workflow specifically to detect peptides that contain inter- and intramolecular disulfide bonds, followed by elucidation of their primary structure. This method is based on the determination of the normalized isotope shift (NIS) and the normalized mass defect (NMD) of peptides, two parameters which are heavily influenced by the presence of sulfur in a peptide, where cysteines are the main contributing residues. Using ant defensive secretions as an example, we describe the initial fractionation of the venom on strong cation exchange followed by nanoflow HPLC and mass spectrometry. High resolution zoom scan spectra of high-abundance peptides are acquired, allowing an accurate determination of both monoisotopic and average mass, which are essential for calculation of NMD and NIS. Candidate peptides exhibiting relative low NMD and high NIS values are selected for targeted de novo sequencing. By fine-tuning the collision energy for optimal fragmentation of each selected precursor ions, the full sequence of several novel inter- and intramolecular disulfide bond containing ant defensive peptides can be established.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,377,572
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,226
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,042
of 330,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#24
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.