↓ Skip to main content

Vaccine Technologies for Veterinary Viral Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Vaccine Technologies for Veterinary Viral Diseases'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Vaccines and Vaccination for Veterinary Viral Diseases: A General Overview.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Using IC-Tagging Methodology for Production and Purification of Epitope-Loaded Protein Microspheres for Vaccination
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Plant-Based Vaccine Antigen Production
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 DNA Vaccines: Experiences in the Swine Model
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Novel Adjuvants and Immunomodulators for Veterinary Vaccines.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Polymerase Mechanism-Based Method of Viral Attenuation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Vaccine Technologies for Veterinary Viral Diseases
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Laboratory-Scale Production of Replication-Deficient Adenovirus Vectored Vaccines
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Generation of Recombinant Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Encoding VP2, NS1, and VP7 Proteins of Bluetongue Virus
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Generation of Recombinant Capripoxvirus Vectors for Vaccines and Gene Knockout Function Studies
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Recombinant Swinepox Virus for Veterinary Vaccine Development
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Generation and Selection of Orf Virus (ORFV) Recombinants
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Polycistronic Herpesvirus Amplicon Vectors for Veterinary Vaccine Development
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Construction and Application of Newcastle Disease Virus-Based Vector Vaccines
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Chimeric Pestivirus Experimental Vaccines
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Vaccine Technologies for Veterinary Viral Diseases
Attention for Chapter 8: Laboratory-Scale Production of Replication-Deficient Adenovirus Vectored Vaccines
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Laboratory-Scale Production of Replication-Deficient Adenovirus Vectored Vaccines
Chapter number 8
Book title
Vaccine Technologies for Veterinary Viral Diseases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3008-1_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3007-4, 978-1-4939-3008-1
Authors

Susan J. Morris, Alison V. Turner, Nicola Green, George M. Warimwe, Morris, Susan J., Turner, Alison V., Green, Nicola, Warimwe, George M.

Abstract

Replication-deficient adenoviruses are potent vaccine development platforms used extensively for human and animal candidate vaccines, largely due to their very good safety and immunogenicity profile. In this chapter we describe a method that can be used in any laboratory for the scalable production of replication-deficient adenovirus vector vaccines to GLP for preclinical studies in animal models, including definitive experimental studies in large target animal species for veterinary applications. We use human adenovirus serotype 5 (HAdV5) as an example, but the method can be easily adapted for use with other adenovirus serotypes from different species of origin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,343,092
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#347
of 14,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,153
of 401,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#50
of 1,467 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,467 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.