You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Investigation of Paternal Programming of Breast Cancer Risk in Female Offspring in Rodent Models
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 11 |
Book title |
Investigations of Early Nutrition Effects on Long-Term Health
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7614-0_11 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7613-3, 978-1-4939-7614-0
|
Authors |
Camile Castilho Fontelles, Raquel Santana da Cruz, Leena Hilakivi-Clarke, Sonia de Assis, Thomas Prates Ong |
Abstract |
Emerging experimental evidence show that fathers' experiences during preconception can influence their daughters' risk of developing breast cancer. Here we describe detailed protocols for investigation in rats and mice of paternally mediated breast cancer risk programming effects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
Librarian | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 23% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,489,831
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,388
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,787
of 442,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.