↓ Skip to main content

Split Inteins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Split Inteins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Affinity Purification of Proteins in Tag-Free Form: Split Intein-Mediated Ultrarapid Purification (SIRP)
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Purification of Microbially Expressed Recombinant Proteins via a Dual ELP Split Intein System
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Intracellular Production of Cyclic Peptide Libraries with SICLOPPS
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Recombinant Expression of Cyclotides Using Split Inteins
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Ribosomal Synthesis of Thioether-Bridged Bicyclic Peptides
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Preparation of Semisynthetic Peptide Macrocycles Using Split Inteins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Semisynthesis of Membrane-Attached Proteins Using Split Inteins
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Protein Chemical Modification Inside Living Cells Using Split Inteins
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Segmental Isotopic Labeling of Proteins for NMR Study Using Intein Technology
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Segmental Isotope Labeling of Insoluble Proteins for Solid-State NMR by Protein Trans-Splicing
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Split-Intein Triggered Protein Hydrogels
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Recessive Pollination Control System for Wheat Based on Intein-Mediated Protein Splicing
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Conditional Toxin Splicing Using a Split Intein System
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Photocontrol of the Src Kinase in Mammalian Cells with a Photocaged Intein
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 LOV2-Controlled Photoactivation of Protein Trans -Splicing
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A Cassette Approach for the Identification of Intein Insertion Sites
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Computational Prediction of New Intein Split Sites
Attention for Chapter 5: Ribosomal Synthesis of Thioether-Bridged Bicyclic Peptides
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ribosomal Synthesis of Thioether-Bridged Bicyclic Peptides
Chapter number 5
Book title
Split Inteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6451-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6449-9, 978-1-4939-6451-2
Authors

Nina Bionda, Rudi Fasan, Bionda, Nina, Fasan, Rudi

Abstract

Many biologically active peptides found in nature exhibit a bicyclic structure wherein a head-to-tail cyclic backbone is further constrained by an intramolecular linkage connecting two side chains of the peptide. Accordingly, methods to access macrocyclic peptides sharing this overall topology could be of significant value toward the discovery of new functional entities and bioactive compounds. With this goal in mind, we recently developed a strategy for enabling the biosynthesis of thioether-bridged bicyclic peptides in living bacterial cells. This method involves a split intein-catalyzed head-to-tail cyclization of a ribosomally produced precursor peptide, combined with inter-sidechain cross-linking through a genetically encoded cysteine-reactive amino acid. This approach can be applied to direct the formation of structurally diverse bicyclic peptides with high efficiency and selectivity in living Escherichia coli cells and provides a platform for the generation of combinatorial libraries of genetically encoded bicyclic peptides for screening purposes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Other 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,487,739
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,388
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,384
of 421,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#468
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.