Chapter title |
Key to Delivery: The (Epi-)genome Editing Vector Toolbox
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 7 |
Book title |
Epigenome Editing
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7774-1_7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7773-4, 978-1-4939-7774-1
|
Authors |
Sabrina Just, Hildegard Büning |
Abstract |
Curing a genetic disease by repairing the underlying genetic defect is a fascinating concept that has been addressed so far by gene compensation therapy. For this, a functional copy of the gene in question together with elements controlling its expression is produced as a vector and introduced ex vivo into the patient's own cells that subsequently are reinfused. Alternatively, vectors are administered directly in vivo. Although this strategy resulted in impressive therapeutic benefits for patients, the ultimate goal of gene therapy, i.e., a cure by repairing the actual genetic or epigenetic defect, remained an unresolved task. With the advent of designer DNA-binding domains, this goal is coming into reach. These domains are either combined with nucleases and used as molecular precision scissors for introducing DNA breaks at defined sites in the cell's genome preparing for position-selective DNA repair, or they are used as programmable DNA-binding units for positioning epigenome-modifying domains to predefined target sequences. However, for reaching its full potential, these components need to be delivered into cells in an efficient and safe manner. Here, we summarize current viral and non-viral delivery approaches applicable for genome and epigenome editing and discuss their respective advantages and limitations. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Linguistics | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |