↓ Skip to main content

Management of Atopic Dermatitis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: The Future of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Future of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment
Chapter number 15
Book title
Management of Atopic Dermatitis
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64804-0_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-964803-3, 978-3-31-964804-0
Authors

Nupur Patel, Lindsay C. Strowd

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing movement towards the use of targeted therapies in treating of atopic dermatitis (AD), parallel to that which has occurred in psoriasis. Among the systemic medications being studied are subcutaneous or intravenously administered biologic drugs targeting specific molecules such as IL4, IL13, IL17, and IgE. Non-biologic oral therapies are also being developed for AD and include small molecule drugs targeting phosphodiesterase type IV (PDE4) inhibition or Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibition. Numerous topical formulations are also being studied, with some formulations that are novel therapies that act as topical biologic or small molecule agents with mechanisms of action similar to systemic treatments. Others are being developed as skin barrier repair therapies for reduction of AD symptoms. This chapter will discuss new advances in AD treatment from medications in the initial stages of development to those nearing FDA approval.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,221,301
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#696
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,549
of 421,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#66
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.