↓ Skip to main content

Brachypodium Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Brachypodium Genomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Methods for Cytogenetic Chromosome Barcoding and Chromosome Painting in Brachypodium distachyon and Its Relative Species
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of Drought Stress Treatments in Brachypodium Leaves
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Brachypodium distachyon Long Noncoding RNAs: Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Highly Efficient and Reproducible Fusarium spp. Inoculation Method for Brachypodium distachyon
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Tissue Culture (Somatic Embryogenesis)-Induced Tnt1 Retrotransposon-Based Mutagenesis in Brachypodium distachyon
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Methods for Xyloglucan Structure Analysis in Brachypodium distachyon
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Genomic Approaches to Analyze Alternative Splicing, A Key Regulator of Transcriptome and Proteome Diversity in Brachypodium distachyon
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Information Resources for Functional Genomics Studies in Brachypodium distachyon
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Methods for Functional Transgenics: Development of Highly Efficient Transformation Protocol in Brachypodium and Its Suitability for Advancing Brachypodium Transgenics
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Molecular Markers in Whole Genome Evolution of Brachypodium
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Estimate Codon Usage Bias Using Codon Usage Analyzer (CUA)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identification of Pseudogenes in Brachypodium distachyon Chromosomes
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 TILLING in Brachypodium distachyon
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Method for the Large-Scale Identification of phasiRNAs in Brachypodium distachyon
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Evaluation of Genome-Wide Markers and Orthologous Markers in Brachypodium distachyon
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Protocol for Coexpression Network Construction and Stress-Responsive Expression Analysis in Brachypodium
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Whole Genome DNA Methylation Analysis Using Next-Generation Sequencing (BS-seq)
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Application of Tissue Culture and Transformation Techniques in Model Species Brachypodium distachyon
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Erratum to: Whole Genome DNA Methylation Analysis of Brachypodium distachyon Using Next-Generation Sequencing (BS-seq)
Attention for Chapter 11: Estimate Codon Usage Bias Using Codon Usage Analyzer (CUA)
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Estimate Codon Usage Bias Using Codon Usage Analyzer (CUA)
Chapter number 11
Book title
Brachypodium Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7278-4_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7276-0, 978-1-4939-7278-4
Authors

Zhenguo Zhang, Gaurav Sablok, Zhang, Zhenguo, Sablok, Gaurav

Abstract

One amino acid is added to a growing peptide by a ribosome through reading triple nucleotides, i.e., a codon, each time. Twenty species of amino acids are often coded by 61 codons, so one amino acid can be coded by more than one codon and the codons coding the same amino acid are called synonymous. Intriguingly, synonymous codons' usage is often uneven: some are used more often than their alternatives in a genome. The unevenness of codon usage is termed codon usage bias (CUB). CUB is widespread, and its causes and consequences have been under intensive investigation. To facilitate the studying of CUB, in this chapter we present a protocol of estimating CUB by using the free software Codon Usage Analyzer, and apply it to Brachypodium distachyon as an example. To accomplish this protocol, the readers need some basic command-line skills. Briefly, the protocol comprises four major steps: downloading data and software, setting up computing environment, preparing data, and estimating CUB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,736,588
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#10,117
of 13,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#380,232
of 444,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,197
of 1,502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.