↓ Skip to main content

Maize

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: A Brief History of Promoter Development for Use in Transgenic Maize Applications
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Brief History of Promoter Development for Use in Transgenic Maize Applications
Chapter number 4
Book title
Maize
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7315-6_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7314-9, 978-1-4939-7315-6
Authors

Michael L. Nuccio

Abstract

Promoters regulate gene expression, and are essential biotechnology tools. Since its introduction in the mid-1990s, biotechnology has greatly enhanced maize productivity primarily through the development of insect control and herbicide tolerance traits. Additional biotechnology applications include improving seed nutrient composition, industrial protein production, therapeutic production, disease resistance, abiotic stress resistance, and yield enhancement. Biotechnology has also greatly expanded basic research into important mechanisms that govern plant growth and reproduction. Many novel promoters have been developed to facilitate this work, but only a few are widely used. Transgene optimization includes a variety of strategies some of which effect promoter structure. Recent reviews examine the state of the art with respect to transgene design for biotechnology applications. This chapter examines the use of transgene technology in maize, focusing on the way promoters are selected and used. The impact of new developments in genomic technology on promoter structure is also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 47%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,573,839
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,961
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,439
of 442,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.