↓ Skip to main content

Gastrointestinal Pharmacology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Gastrointestinal Pharmacology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 102 Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Current Therapeutic Approaches
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 103 Serotonergic Mechanisms Regulating the GI Tract: Experimental Evidence and Therapeutic Relevance
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 104 Ghrelin and Motilin Control Systems in GI Physiology and Therapeutics
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 105 Cannabinoid Receptors in Regulating the GI Tract: Experimental Evidence and Therapeutic Relevance
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 106 Centrally Targeted Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Abdominal Pain: Understanding and Management
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 107 Abnormal Barrier Function in Gastrointestinal Disorders
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 108 Postoperative Ileus: Pathophysiology, Current Therapeutic Approaches
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 109 Neuroimmune Modulation of Gut Function
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 111 Constipation: Pathophysiology and Current Therapeutic Approaches
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 114 Upper GI Disorders: Pathophysiology and Current Therapeutic Approaches
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 115 The Role of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Visceral Pain
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 116 Insights into the Role of Opioid Receptors in the GI Tract: Experimental Evidence and Therapeutic Relevance
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 118 Gastrointestinal Physiology and Function
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 119 Gastrointestinal Pharmacology
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 120 Critical Evaluation of Animal Models of Gastrointestinal Disorders
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 121 Sex-Related Differences in GI Disorders
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 122 Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathophysiology and Current Therapeutic Approaches
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 128 Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Stress-Related Psychiatric Co-morbidities: Focus on Early Life Stress
Attention for Chapter 121: Sex-Related Differences in GI Disorders
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Sex-Related Differences in GI Disorders
Chapter number 121
Book title
Gastrointestinal Pharmacology
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/164_2016_121
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-956359-6, 978-3-31-956360-2
Authors

Dawn K. Prusator, Lin Chang

Abstract

Epidemiological studies indicate sex-related differences among functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) wherein females are more likely to receive a diagnosis than their male counterparts. However, the mechanism by which females exhibit an increased vulnerability for development of these pathophysiologies remains largely unknown, and therapeutic treatments are limited. The current chapter focuses on clinical research outlining our current knowledge of factors that contribute to the female predominance among FGID patients such as the menstrual cycle and sex hormones. In addition, we will discuss progress in preclinical research, including animal models, which serve as valuable tools for the investigation of the development and long term manifestation of symptoms observed within the patient population. Although much progress has been made, additional longitudinal studies in both clinical and preclinical research are necessary to identify more specific mechanisms underlying sex-related differences in FGIDs as well as targets for improved therapeutic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,481,147
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#399
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,320
of 421,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.