You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
CASED: Curriculum Adaptive Sampling for Extreme Data Imbalance
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 73 |
Book title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017
|
Published in |
arXiv, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_73 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-966178-0, 978-3-31-966179-7
|
Authors |
Andrew Jesson, Nicolas Guizard, Sina Hamidi Ghalehjegh, Damien Goblot, Florian Soudan, Nicolas Chapados |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 28% |
Researcher | 14 | 22% |
Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 29 | 45% |
Engineering | 11 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,078,809
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#196,885
of 946,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,849
of 316,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#4,099
of 19,972 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19,972 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.