You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Scalable Multimodal Convolutional Networks for Brain Tumour Segmentation
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 33 |
Book title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017
|
Published in |
arXiv, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_33 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-966178-0, 978-3-31-966179-7
|
Authors |
Lucas Fidon, Wenqi Li, Luis C. Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, Jinendra Ekanayake, Neil Kitchen, Sebastien Ourselin, Tom Vercauteren |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 30% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
India | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 29% |
Researcher | 22 | 19% |
Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 47 | 41% |
Engineering | 16 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,574,977
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#112,076
of 943,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,321
of 316,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#1,980
of 19,977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 943,185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19,977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.