You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Progressive and Multi-Path Holistically Nested Neural Networks for
Pathological Lung Segmentation from CT Images
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 71 |
Book title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017
|
Published in |
arXiv, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_71 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-966178-0, 978-3-31-966179-7
|
Authors |
Adam P. Harrison, Ziyue Xu, Kevin George, Le Lu, Ronald M. Summers, Daniel J. Mollura |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 37 | 33% |
Engineering | 15 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 37 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,557,147
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#230,484
of 942,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,599
of 317,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#5,107
of 18,749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18,749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.