You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Building Disease Detection Algorithms with Very Small Numbers of Positive Samples
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 54 |
Book title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017
|
Published in |
arXiv, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_54 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-966178-0, 978-3-31-966179-7
|
Authors |
Ken C. L. Wong, Alexandros Karargyris, Tanveer Syeda-Mahmood, Mehdi Moradi |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
India | 2 | 17% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 12 | 35% |
Engineering | 5 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,566,680
of 24,099,692 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#136,043
of 1,020,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,297
of 319,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#2,296
of 20,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,099,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020,419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.