↓ Skip to main content

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Acute Myeloid Leukemia'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Molecular Malfeasance Mediating Myeloid Malignancies: The Genetics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Cytochemical Staining
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Immunohistochemistry in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Immunophenotyping by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Single-Cell Mass Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Leukemia Stem/Progenitor Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Design and Application of Multiplex PCR Seq for the Detection of Somatic Mutations Associated with Myeloid Malignancies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 AMLprofiler: A Diagnostic and Prognostic Microarray for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Microsphere-Based Assessment of DNA Methylation for AML Prognosis
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Hematopoietic Cells: DNA Methylation Analysis by WGBS
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Detection and Quantification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Associated Fusion Transcripts
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing of Acute Leukemia
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Bioinformatics Data Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing Data from Heterogeneous Tumor Samples
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Zebrafish Model for Evaluating the Function of Human Leukemic Gene IDH1 and Its Mutation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Measurement of Oncometabolites d-2-Hydroxyglutaric Acid and l-2-Hydroxyglutaric Acid
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Nanofluidic Allele-Specific Digital PCR Method for Quantifying IDH1 and IDH2 Mutation Burden in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isolation of Biologically Active Exosomes from Plasma of Patients with Cancer
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Generating and Expanding Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Attention for Chapter 2: Cytochemical Staining
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cytochemical Staining
Chapter number 2
Book title
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7142-8_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7140-4, 978-1-4939-7142-8
Authors

Michele E. Paessler, Marybeth Helfrich, Gerald B. W. Wertheim, Paessler, Michele E., Helfrich, Marybeth, Wertheim, Gerald B. W.

Abstract

Historically, the diagnosis and classification of acute leukemia involved morphologic review of blasts in the peripheral blood and bone marrow smears and cytochemical staining. Cytochemical stains, which are enzymatic colorimetric reactions that occur in the cells of interest, were necessary to assign and confirm myeloid and lymphoid lineage. In the current WHO 2008 Classification of leukemia, immunophenotyping and cytogenetic analysis have largely replaced cytochemical staining in the characterization of acute leukemias. Nonetheless, cytochemical testing remains a useful adjunct assay for the proper classification of acute leukemia in a number of diagnostic settings. This chapter reviews the principles of the most common cytochemical stains, their procedures and guides to interpretation, and results in acute myeloid leukemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,073,354
of 24,875,365 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,626
of 13,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,571
of 431,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#175
of 1,080 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,080 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.