You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
New Insights from Drosophila into the Regulation of EGFR Signaling
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
ErbB Receptor Signaling
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7219-7_2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7218-0, 978-1-4939-7219-7
|
| Authors |
Nicholas Harden |
| Abstract |
Genetic analysis of Egfr signaling in Drosophila has a long-standing track record of making important contributions to our understanding of the Egfr pathway. While the central Ras/MAPK pathway has long been well defined, there is much to learn with regard to its cross talk with other pathways and how it is regulated. A better understanding of the regulation of Egfr signaling is of particular interest with regard to the participation of misregulated Egfr signaling in tumorigenesis. Recent studies in the fly have led to some surprising results, identifying regulators of Egfr acting in unexpected ways. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 83% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,223,188
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,049
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,016
of 423,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#344
of 1,073 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,073 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.