↓ Skip to main content

Natural Antibodies

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Natural Antibodies'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Natural Antibodies: Next Steps Toward Translational Investigation
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Isolation of Natural Anti-FcεRIα Autoantibodies from Healthy Donors
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation of Antibodies from Human Plasma, Saliva, Breast Milk, and Gastrointestinal Fluid
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Purification of Natural Antibodies Against Tau Protein by Affinity Chromatography
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Unbiased RACE-Based Massive Parallel Surveys of Human IgA Antibody Repertoires
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Analysis of Signaling Events in B-1a Cells
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Exploring the Role of Microbiota in the Limiting of B1 and MZ B-Cell Numbers by Naturally Secreted Immunoglobulins
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Assessment of Anti-Tumor Cytotoxic Activity of Naturally Occurring Antibodies in Human Serum or Plasma
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Hydrolysis and Dissolution of Amyloids by Catabodies
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methods for Posttranslational Induction of Polyreactivity of Antibodies
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Characterization of Natural IgM Antibodies Recognizing Oxidation-Specific Epitopes on Circulating Microvesicles
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Natural Monoclonal Antibody to Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Detection of Natural Antibodies and Serological Diagnosis of Pneumococcal Pneumonia Using a Bead-Based High-Throughput Assay
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Detection of Naturally Occurring Human Antibodies Against Gangliosides by ELISA
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Evaluating the Impact of Natural IgM on Adenovirus Type 5 Gene Therapy Vectors
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Erratum to: Hydrolysis and Dissolution of Amyloids by Catabodies
Attention for Chapter 7: Exploring the Role of Microbiota in the Limiting of B1 and MZ B-Cell Numbers by Naturally Secreted Immunoglobulins
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Exploring the Role of Microbiota in the Limiting of B1 and MZ B-Cell Numbers by Naturally Secreted Immunoglobulins
Chapter number 7
Book title
Natural Antibodies
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7180-0_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7179-4, 978-1-4939-7180-0
Authors

Elodie Mohr, Andreia C. Lino, Mohr, Elodie, Lino, Andreia C.

Editors

Srinivas V. Kaveri, Jagadeesh Bayry

Abstract

Immunoglobulins (Igs)-or antibodies (Ab)-are important to combat foreign pathogens but also to the immune system homeostasis. We developed the AID(-/-)μS(-/-) mouse model devoid of total soluble Igs and suitable to monitor the role of Igs on immune homeostasis. We used this experimental system to uncover a negative feedback control of marginal zone (MZ) and B1 B cells numbers by naturally secreted Igs. We raised AID(-/-)μS(-/-) mice in germ-free conditions demonstrating that this effect of natural secreted Igs is independent of the microbiota. Herein, we provide a comprehensive description of the protocols to establish and use the AID(-/-)μS(-/-) mice to study the role of total secreted Igs or of different Ig classes. This study involves Igs injections to AID(-/-)μS(-/-) mice or establishment of AID(-/-)μS(-/-) mixed bone marrow chimeras that provide a powerful system to study AID(-/-)μS(-/-) B cells in the presence of stable concentrations of different Ig classes. While we describe flow cytometric and histological methods to analyze MZ and B1 B cell subsets, AID(-/-)μS(-/-) mice can be used to study the effects of natural Igs on other B cell subsets or immune cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,070,926
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,959
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,928
of 314,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#55
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.