↓ Skip to main content

Thermogenic Fat

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Thermogenic Fat'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Isolation, Primary Culture, and Differentiation of Preadipocytes from Mouse Brown Adipose Tissue
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Isolation of Mouse Stromal Vascular Cells for Monolayer Culture
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Flow Cytometry Assisted Isolation of Adipose Tissue Derived Stem Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Flow Cytometric Isolation and Differentiation of Adipogenic Progenitor Cells into Brown and Brite/Beige Adipocytes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Immuno-Magnetic Isolation and Thermogenic Differentiation of White Adipose Tissue Progenitor Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Isolation of Immune Cells from Adipose Tissue for Flow Cytometry
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Differentiation and Metabolic Interrogation of Human Adipocytes
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Protocols for Generation of Immortalized Human Brown and White Preadipocyte Cell Lines
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Gene Expression and Histological Analysis of Activated Brown Adipocytes in Adipose Tissue
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Genetic Mouse Models: The Powerful Tools to Study Fat Tissues
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Genetic Manipulation with Viral Vectors to Assess Metabolism and Adipose Tissue Function
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Bioenergetic Analyses in Adipose Tissue
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Oxygen Consumption Rate and Energy Expenditure in Mice: Indirect Calorimetry
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Isolation and Patch-Clamp of Primary Adipocytes
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 In Vitro Approaches to Model and Study Communication Between Adipose Tissue and the Liver
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Identification and Quantification of Human Brown Adipose Tissue
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Designing 3-D Adipospheres for Quantitative Metabolic Study
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Culture and Sampling of Primary Adipose Tissue in Practical Microfluidic Systems
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Using Thermogenic Beige Cells to Identify Biologically Active Small Molecules and Peptides
Attention for Chapter 3: Flow Cytometry Assisted Isolation of Adipose Tissue Derived Stem Cells
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Flow Cytometry Assisted Isolation of Adipose Tissue Derived Stem Cells
Chapter number 3
Book title
Thermogenic Fat
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6820-6_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6819-0, 978-1-4939-6820-6
Authors

Umesh D. Wankhade, Sushil G. Rane

Editors

Jun Wu

Abstract

Adipose tissue dysfunction is typically seen in metabolic diseases, particularly obesity and diabetes. White adipocytes store fat while brown adipocyte dissipates it via thermogenesis. In addition, beige adipocytes develop in white fat depots in response to stimulation of β-adrenergic pathways. It appears that the three types of adipocytes-white, brown, and beige-can be formed de novo from stem/precursor cells or via transdifferentiation. Identifying the presumptive progenitors that harbor capacity to differentiate to these distinct adipocyte cell types will enable their functional characterization. Moreover, the presence or absence of white/brown/beige adipocytes is correlated with metabolic dysfunction making their study of medical relevance. Robust, reliable, and reproducible methods of identification and isolation of adipocyte progenitors will stimulate further detailed understanding of white, brown, and beige adipogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,450,375
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,372
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,469
of 310,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#98
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.