↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Clocks

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 653)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
751 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock
Chapter number 1
Book title
Circadian Clocks
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-25950-0_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-225949-4, 978-3-64-225950-0
Authors

Ethan D. Buhr, Joseph S. Takahashi, Buhr, Ethan D., Takahashi, Joseph S.

Editors

Achim Kramer, Martha Merrow

Abstract

Mammals synchronize their circadian activity primarily to the cycles of light and darkness in the environment. This is achieved by ocular photoreception relaying signals to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the hypothalamus. Signals from the SCN cause the synchronization of independent circadian clocks throughout the body to appropriate phases. Signals that can entrain these peripheral clocks include humoral signals, metabolic factors, and body temperature. At the level of individual tissues, thousands of genes are brought to unique phases through the actions of a local transcription/translation-based feedback oscillator and systemic cues. In this molecular clock, the proteins CLOCK and BMAL1 cause the transcription of genes which ultimately feedback and inhibit CLOCK and BMAL1 transcriptional activity. Finally, there are also other molecular circadian oscillators which can act independently of the transcription-based clock in all species which have been tested.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 751 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 739 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 164 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 19%
Student > Master 104 14%
Researcher 62 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 5%
Other 85 11%
Unknown 158 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 185 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 73 10%
Neuroscience 72 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 2%
Other 89 12%
Unknown 173 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#468,832
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#19
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,492
of 217,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.