↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Clocks

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Circadian clocks and metabolism.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 689)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
13 X users
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Circadian clocks and metabolism.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Circadian Clocks
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-25950-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-225949-4, 978-3-64-225950-0
Authors

Marcheva B, Ramsey KM, Peek CB, Affinati A, Maury E, Bass J, Biliana Marcheva, Kathryn M. Ramsey, Clara B. Peek, Alison Affinati, Eleonore Maury, Joseph Bass, Marcheva, Biliana, Ramsey, Kathryn M., Peek, Clara B., Affinati, Alison, Maury, Eleonore, Bass, Joseph

Editors

Achim Kramer, Martha Merrow

Abstract

Circadian clocks maintain periodicity in internal cycles of behavior, physiology, and metabolism, enabling organisms to anticipate the 24-h rotation of the Earth. In mammals, circadian integration of metabolic systems optimizes energy harvesting and utilization across the light/dark cycle. Disruption of clock genes has recently been linked to sleep disorders and to the development of cardiometabolic disease. Conversely, aberrant nutrient signaling affects circadian rhythms of behavior. This chapter reviews the emerging relationship between the molecular clock and metabolic systems and examines evidence that circadian disruption exerts deleterious consequences on human health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 20%
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Master 25 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 12%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 72 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#745,097
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#24
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,255
of 223,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.