↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Clocks

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: The Circadian Control of Sleep
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 644)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Circadian Control of Sleep
Chapter number 7
Book title
Circadian Clocks
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-25950-0_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-225949-4, 978-3-64-225950-0
Authors

Fisher SP, Foster RG, Peirson SN, Simon P. Fisher, Russell G. Foster, Stuart N. Peirson

Editors

Achim Kramer, Martha Merrow

Abstract

The sleep/wake cycle is arguably the most familiar output of the circadian system, however, sleep is a complex biological process that arises from multiple brain regions and neurotransmitters, which is regulated by numerous physiological and environmental factors. These include a circadian drive for wakefulness as well as an increase in the requirement for sleep with prolonged waking (the sleep homeostat). In this chapter, we describe the regulation of sleep, with a particular emphasis on the contribution of the circadian system. Since their identification, the role of clock genes in the regulation of sleep has attracted considerable interest, and here, we provide an overview of the interplay between specific elements of the molecular clock with the sleep regulatory system. Finally, we summarise the role of the light environment, melatonin and social cues in the modulation of sleep, with a focus on the role of melanopsin ganglion cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Neuroscience 12 12%
Psychology 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,175,844
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#40
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,384
of 215,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.