↓ Skip to main content

Oogenesis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Oogenesis
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Oogenesis
Chapter number 3
Book title
Oogenesis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3795-0_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3793-6, 978-1-4939-3795-0
Authors

Lie-Jensen, Anette, Haglund, Kaisa, Anette Lie-Jensen, Kaisa Haglund

Editors

Ioannis P. Nezis

Abstract

Drosophila oogenesis is a powerful model for studying a wide spectrum of cellular and developmental processes in vivo. Oogenesis starts in a specialized structure called the germarium, which harbors the stem cells for both germ and somatic cells. The germarium produces egg chambers, each of which will develop into an egg. Active areas of research in Drosophila germaria include stem cell self-renewal, division, and maintenance, cell cycle control and differentiation, oocyte specification, intercellular communication, and signaling, among others. The solid knowledge base, the genetic tractability of the Drosophila model, as well as the availability and fast development of tools and imaging techniques for oogenesis research ensure that studies in this model will keep being instrumental for novel discoveries within cell and developmental biology also in the future. This chapter focuses on antibody staining in Drosophila germaria and provides a protocol for immunostaining as well as an overview of commonly used antibodies for visualization of different cell types and cellular structures. The protocol is well-suited for subsequent confocal microscopy analyses, and in addition we present key adaptations of the protocol that are useful when performing structured illumination microscopy (SIM) super-resolution imaging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,199
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,141
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#873
of 1,472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.