↓ Skip to main content

Oogenesis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Oogenesis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Oogenesis
Chapter number 11
Book title
Oogenesis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3795-0_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3793-6, 978-1-4939-3795-0
Authors

Borrego-Pinto, Joana, Somogyi, Kálmán, Lénárt, Péter, Joana Borrego-Pinto, Kálmán Somogyi, Péter Lénárt

Editors

Ioannis P. Nezis

Abstract

High throughput DNA sequencing, the decreasing costs of DNA synthesis, and universal techniques for genetic manipulation have made it much easier and quicker to establish molecular tools for any organism than it has been 5 years ago. This opens a great opportunity for reviving "nonconventional" model organisms, which are particularly suited to study a specific biological process and many of which have already been established before the era of molecular biology. By taking advantage of transcriptomics, in particular, these systems can now be easily turned into full fetched models for molecular cell biology.As an example, here we describe how we established molecular tools in the starfish Patiria miniata, which has been a popular model for cell and developmental biology due to the synchronous and rapid development, transparency, and easy handling of oocytes, eggs, and embryos. Here, we detail how we used a de novo assembled transcriptome to produce molecular markers and established conditions for live imaging to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying centriole elimination-a poorly understood process essential for sexual reproduction of animal species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Chemistry 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#13,986,767
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,940
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,676
of 393,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#386
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.