↓ Skip to main content

Nucleic Acid Aptamers

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Nucleic Acid Aptamers
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nucleic Acid Aptamers
Chapter number 8
Book title
Nucleic Acid Aptamers
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3197-2_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3196-5, 978-1-4939-3197-2
Authors

Breitsprecher, Dennis, Schlinck, Nina, Witte, David, Duhr, Stefan, Baaske, Philipp, Schubert, Thomas, Dennis Breitsprecher, Nina Schlinck, David Witte, Stefan Duhr, Philipp Baaske, Thomas Schubert

Abstract

The characterization and development of highly specific aptamers requires the analysis of the interaction strength between aptamer and target. MicroScale Thermophoresis (MST) is a rapid and precise method to quantify biomolecular interactions in solution at microliter scale. The basis of this technology is a physical effect referred to as thermophoresis, which describes the directed movement of molecules through temperature gradients. The thermophoretic properties of a molecule depend on its size, charge, and hydration shell. Since at least one of these parameters is altered upon binding of a ligand, this method can be used to analyze virtually any biomolecular interaction in any buffer or complex bioliquid. This section provides a detailed protocol describing how MST is used to obtain quantitative binding parameters for aptamer-target interactions. The two DNA-aptamers HD1 and HD22, which are targeted against human thrombin, are used as model systems to demonstrate a rapid and straightforward screening approach to determine optimal buffer conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
China 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Chemistry 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,788
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,920
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,751
of 393,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,054
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.