You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Do Dietary Factors Influence Tendon Metabolism?
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 27 |
| Book title |
Metabolic Influences on Risk for Tendon Disorders
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-33943-6_27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-933941-2, 978-3-31-933943-6
|
| Authors |
Alex Scott, Cara Nordin, Scott, Alex, Nordin, Cara |
| Editors |
Paul W. Ackermann, David A. Hart |
| Abstract |
There is very little direct research to conclusively prove the relevance of diet in primary tendinopathies, however it seems prudent to ask whether our current knowledge about the impact of nutrition on collagen metabolism could be useful in assessing, preventing, or treating tendinopathy. The objective of this chapter is to discuss the potential impact (negative or positive) that nutrition may have on the metabolism of tendons by summarizing the related research. The chapter briefly discusses the roles that specific vitamins, amino acids, lipids, and antioxidants have in various processes of the body that may be directly or indirectly related to tenocyte metabolism. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 28% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,948,863
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#267
of 5,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,072
of 344,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.