You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Drug-Induced Tendon Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 22 |
| Book title |
Metabolic Influences on Risk for Tendon Disorders
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-33943-6_22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-933941-2, 978-3-31-933943-6
|
| Authors |
Karsten Knobloch, Knobloch, Karsten |
| Editors |
Paul W. Ackermann, David A. Hart |
| Abstract |
Drug-induced tendon disorders are an often underestimated risk factor. The range from detrimental effects on the tendon include tendinopathy as well as potentially tendon rupture. As for today, four main drug classes have been reported to be associated with potentially deteriorated tendon properties: 1. Corticosteroids, 2. Chinolon antibiotics, 3. Aromatase inhbitors, 4. Statins as HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors. Most often, the Achilles tendon is affected in terms of tendinopathy and/or subsequent tendon rupture. However, nearly every tendon of the entire body might be affected in a detrimental way by one or a combination of the aformentioned agents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,134,835
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,253
of 5,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,669
of 356,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#12
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.