↓ Skip to main content

Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections
Chapter number 5
Book title
Inflammasome Signaling and Bacterial Infections
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41171-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-941170-5, 978-3-31-941171-2
Authors

Hermansson, Anna-Karin, Paciello, Ida, Bernardini, Maria Lina, Anna-Karin Hermansson, Ida Paciello, Maria Lina Bernardini

Abstract

Shigella spp. are the causative agents of bacillary dysentery, leading to extensive mortality and morbidity worldwide. These facultative intracellular bacteria invade the epithelium of the colon and the rectum, inducing a severe inflammatory response from which the symptoms of the disease originate. Shigella are human pathogens able to manipulate and subvert the innate immune system surveillance. Shigella dampens inflammasome activation in epithelial cells. In infected macrophages, inflammasome activation and IL-1β and IL-18 release lead to massive neutrophil recruitment and greatly contribute to inflammation. Here, we describe how Shigella hijacks and finely tunes inflammasome activation in the different cell populations involved in pathogenesis: epithelial cells, macrophages, neutrophils, DCs, and B and T lymphocytes. Shigella emerges as a "sly" pathogen that switches on/off the inflammasome mechanisms in order to optimize the interaction with the host and establish a successful infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,722
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#446
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,976
of 393,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.