↓ Skip to main content

RNA Processing

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: RNA Processing
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
RNA Processing
Chapter number 1
Book title
RNA Processing
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-29073-7_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-929071-3, 978-3-31-929073-7
Authors

Van Nostrand, Eric L, Huelga, Stephanie C, Yeo, Gene W, Eric L. Van Nostrand, Stephanie C. Huelga, Gene W. Yeo, Nostrand, Eric L. Van, Huelga, Stephanie C., Yeo, Gene W.

Abstract

After an RNA is transcribed, it undergoes a variety of processing steps that can change the encoded protein sequence (through alternative splicing and RNA editing), regulate the stability of the RNA, and control subcellular localization, timing, and rate of translation. The recent explosion in genomics techniques has enabled transcriptome-wide profiling of RNA processing in an unbiased manner. However, it has also brought with it both experimental challenges in developing improved methods to probe distinct processing steps, as well as computational challenges in data storage, processing, and analysis tools to enable large-scale interpretation in the genomics era. In this chapter we review experimental techniques and challenges in profiling various aspects of RNA processing, as well as recent efforts to develop analyses integrating multiple data sources and techniques to infer RNA regulatory networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,983,198
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,008
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,672
of 393,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#177
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.