↓ Skip to main content

RNA Processing

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Tethered Function Assays as Tools to Elucidate the Molecular Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tethered Function Assays as Tools to Elucidate the Molecular Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins
Chapter number 3
Book title
RNA Processing
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-29073-7_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-929071-3, 978-3-31-929073-7
Authors

Tomas J. Bos, Julia K. Nussbacher, Stefan Aigner, Gene W. Yeo, Bos, Tomas J., Nussbacher, Julia K., Aigner, Stefan, Yeo, Gene W.

Abstract

Dynamic regulation of RNA molecules is critical to the survival and development of cells. Messenger RNAs are transcribed in the nucleus as intron-containing pre-mRNAs and bound by RNA-binding proteins, which control their fate by regulating RNA stability, splicing, polyadenylation, translation, and cellular localization. Most RBPs have distinct mRNA-binding and functional domains; thus, the function of an RBP can be studied independently of RNA-binding by artificially recruiting the RBP to a reporter RNA and then measuring the effect of RBP recruitment on reporter splicing, stability, translational efficiency, or intracellular trafficking. These tethered function assays therefore do not require prior knowledge of the RBP's endogenous RNA targets or its binding sites within these RNAs. Here, we provide an overview of the experimental strategy and the strengths and limitations of common tethering systems. We illustrate specific examples of the application of the assay in elucidating the function of various classes of RBPs. We also discuss how classic tethering assay approaches and insights gained from them have been empowered by more recent technological advances, including efficient genome editing and high-throughput RNA-sequencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 31%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 20%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,314,570
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,302
of 5,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,352
of 400,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#126
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.