↓ Skip to main content

RNA Processing

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Regulation of Tissue-Specific Alternative Splicing: C. elegans as a Model System
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Regulation of Tissue-Specific Alternative Splicing: C. elegans as a Model System
Chapter number 10
Book title
RNA Processing
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-29073-7_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-929071-3, 978-3-31-929073-7
Authors

Xicotencatl Gracida, Adam D. Norris, John A. Calarco, Gracida, Xicotencatl, Norris, Adam D., Calarco, John A.

Abstract

Alternative pre-mRNA splicing serves as an elegant mechanism for generating transcriptomic and proteomic diversity between cell and tissue types. In this chapter, we highlight key concepts and outstanding goals in studies of tissue and cell-specific alternative splicing. We place particular emphasis on the use of C. elegans as a tractable model organism for in vivo studies of alternative splicing between tissues and also at single cell resolution. We describe our current understanding of tissue and cell-specific regulation in the animal, and emerging techniques that will allow for future mechanistic studies as well as systems level investigations of spatio-temporal splicing under laboratory conditions and in response to environmental stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 35%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,562,247
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,325
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,488
of 394,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#285
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.