↓ Skip to main content

The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology
Chapter number 2
Book title
The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1498-7_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-101496-3, 978-9-81-101498-7
Authors

Li, Ling, Song, Xu, Ling Li, Xu Song

Editors

Erwei Song

Abstract

It is clear that RNA is more than just a messenger between gene and protein. The mammalian genome is pervasively transcribed, giving rise to tens of thousands of noncoding transcripts, especially long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). Whether all of these large transcripts are functional remains to be elucidated, but it is evident that there are many lncRNAs that seem not to be the "noise" of the transcriptome. Recent studies have set out to decode the regulatory role and functional diversity of lncRNAs in human physiological and pathological processes, and accumulating evidence suggests that most of the functional lncRNAs achieve their biological functions by controlling gene expression. In this chapter, we will organize these studies to provide a detailed description of the involvement of lncRNAs in the major steps of gene expression that include epigenetic regulation, RNA transcription, posttranscriptional RNA processing, protein translation, and posttranslational protein modification and highlight the molecular mechanisms through which lncRNAs function, involving the interactions between lncRNAs and other biological macromolecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,475,442
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,897
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,980
of 355,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#27
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.