↓ Skip to main content

The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology
Chapter number 4
Book title
The Long and Short Non-coding RNAs in Cancer Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1498-7_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-101496-3, 978-9-81-101498-7
Authors

Suzuki, Hiromu, Maruyama, Reo, Yamamoto, Eiichiro, Niinuma, Takeshi, Kai, Masahiro, Hiromu Suzuki, Reo Maruyama, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Takeshi Niinuma, Masahiro Kai

Editors

Erwei Song

Abstract

Epigenetic alterations, including aberrant DNA methylation and histone modification, play key roles in the dysregulation of tumor-related genes, thereby affecting numerous cellular processes, including cell proliferation, cell adhesion, apoptosis, and metastasis. In recent years, studies have demonstrated that short and long noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are key players in the initiation and progression of cancer, and epigenetic mechanisms are deeply involved in their dysregulation. Indeed, the growing list of microRNA (miRNA) genes aberrantly methylated in cancer suggests that a large number of miRNAs act as tumor suppressors or oncogenes. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that dysregulation of long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) plays critical roles in tumorigenesis. And because ncRNAs are involved in regulating gene expression through interaction with epigenetic modifiers, their dysregulation appears causally related to epigenetic alterations in cancer. Dissection of the interrelationships between ncRNAs and epigenetic alterations has the potential to reveal novel approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Unspecified 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,810,867
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,102
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,225
of 355,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#55
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.