You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Molecular Toxicology Protocols
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 38 |
| Book title |
Molecular Toxicology Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-739-6_38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-738-9, 978-1-62703-739-6
|
| Authors |
McCready S, Shirley McCready |
| Editors |
Phouthone Keohavong, Stephen G. Grant |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,327
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,041
of 305,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#96
of 596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.