You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
RNA Processing
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
RNA Processing
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-29073-7_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-929071-3, 978-3-31-929073-7
|
| Authors |
Fan, Alexander C, Leung, Anthony K L, Fan, Alexander C., Leung, Anthony K. L., Alexander C. Fan, Anthony K. L. Leung |
| Abstract |
RNA granules are microscopically visible cellular structures that aggregate by protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions. Using stress granules as an example, we discuss the principles of RNA granule formation, which rely on the multivalency of RNA and multi-domain proteins as well as low-affinity interactions between proteins with prion-like/low-complexity domains (e.g. FUS and TDP-43). We then explore how dysregulation of RNA granule formation is linked to neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), and discuss possible strategies for therapeutic intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 27% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 37% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,827,238
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#247
of 5,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,919
of 355,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.